Thursday, April 2, 2015

A Bit of Twentieth Century History: the Revival of the Organ

Readers who may have stopped by here in recent months may have wondered what ever happened to the author.  The answer is I am still here but have been pre-occupied with other matters, including other blogs.  With this post I am happy to return here and to revive the discussion about the relevance of church music, along with its challenges.  


T he pipe organ is called the king of instruments for a reason.  But if we can't have kings in America, we need a different moniker.  Calling it the "President" of instruments won't do.  Maybe, for now, we can just call it God's instrument.  Well, perhaps that's not humble enough, but it is certainly a truthful description of so mighty and useful an instrument.

At the article linked to below, you can find a fine history of the organ revival starting with Albert Schweitzer in the last years of the nineteenth century on into the twentieth century including the post-war years in America.

Sadly, the author, Lawrence Phelps, is no longer with us.  We will need to pick up this subject later in order to provide a bit more history of the most recent years.

Still, the direction of American organ building, while not entirely clear, does seem to be heading in a very good direction -- one of greater clarity of tone as well as an appropriate richness of tone.  These are opposites, of course.*  I hope to have more to say about all this later.



The Organ Revival Movement Explicated


*For more on opposites in music I recommend the writings of composer Edward Green, some of whose work is listed here:  <  http://www.edgreenmusic.org/1-technique-beauty.htm  >.     



No comments: